![]() |
![]() |
|
Monday, March 8th, 2010
By Tyler King
We recently decided that this blog should focus on the technology needs for small businesses. You might wonder why a small business shouldn't just use the same tools as bigger companies, so this post will outline just a few of the reasons.
In case you're not sure what we mean by "big-business software", here's a trick: you can normally tell the target market for software by looking for annoying acronyms and buzz words. If software is described as an "enterprise-level data-driven ERP solution", that means it's meant for giant companies. At giant companies, decisions are made by people that want to feel like they're doing something really complicated, and software vendors know how to pander to that audience.
We'll write a lot more on the topic in future posts, but companies like Oracle, SAP and even Microsoft make most of their money by selling to huge corporations, and they simply don't offer products that are right for small businesses (most of the time). Here are six reasons why you should look elsewhere for your technology needs:
You don't want to overpay This is the easiest of these reasons to measure. Big companies have a lot of money, and software vendors want as much of it as possible. Most small businesses simply can't afford to use "enterprise-level" (read:overpriced) software. One easy way to tell if a company is charging too much is if they don't publish their prices online. If you go to a website to buy a product and you can't tell how much it costs without talking to a sales rep, you can bet it's way too expensive.
You don't need all those features
Big-business software is meant to do everything. This sounds like a good thing until you try to actually use it and you can't figure out how because it's too complicated. Your software should do what you need it to do, and anything extra is just unnecessary clutter. This is also related to the price issue, because even if you're not using all the features, you're still paying for them.
You don't have an I.T. team
We've already said that big-business software is complicated, but that doesn't just impact the users. The more complex the software gets, the more work is generally required to set it up and keep it running. Big companies have large I.T. departments to take care of everything, but who's going to be responsible at your company when your fancy new server crashes? You won't be taken seriously
If a software company is used to serving large clients, why would they spend their time worrying about you? Most big-business software companies won't even talk to you without knowing how many employees work at your business, and they obviously aren't going to treat you quite the same as they would a larger client.You're lucky enough to have a choice
Many people assume that the tools used at large companies are better than the ones used at smaller companies. They cost more, they have fancy buzz words, and large corporations must know what they're doing when it comes to software purchasing. This couldn't be further from the truth. Many large companies are still using horribly outdated software (like IE6) because it takes a tremendous investment for a large company to make even a small change. You have the ability to avoid all that endless bureaucracy.
Software can be one of your competitive advantages I wrote an earlier post about how trying to copy the big guys is a mistake. By assuming that you should use the same tools as big companies, you're effectively deciding to play the game using their rules. In order for a small company to succeed, they need to be disruptive. If you're lucky enough to work at a small company (or run your own company), you can gain a serious edge on your competition by using technology in ways that they can't. The main point that I want to make is that you should celebrate the fact that you don't have to use big-business software. Hopefully if you keep reading this blog, we can help you decide what you should use instead.
Thursday, March 4th, 2010
By Tyler King
This post is going to cover the most basic aspect of your company's online identity: your domain name. Most people know most of this already, but I think it makes sense to start from the beginning and work our way to more advanced topics later.
So first, what is a domain name? It's basically just the address that is used to access a website. For example, Yahoo's domain name is "yahoo.com" or "www.yahoo.com". If you want a website, or an email address that ends with @Your_Company.com, you have to buy a domain name. They only cost about $10/year, so there's no reason not to have one.
It's important to know that a domain name has nothing to do with website hosting. You can own the domain name example.com, but that doesn't mean you have a website. Many companies sell hosting plans and domain names together, but you can choose to buy a domain name on it's own. This means that even if you don't think you'll have time to get a website set up in the near future, you should buy the domain now so that you have it. You can worry about what to do with it later.
Now let's get into the different parts of a domain name. A domain name is generally split into three parts: (1)www . (2)yourcompany . (3)com. I'll explain them in reverse order.
(3) Top-level domains
Every domain name has to end with a top-level domain. There are different ones to choose from, but the most common ones (in America at least) are .com, .org, and .net. There are other options to choose from, but when you buy your domain name, the top-level domain has to be selected from one of the options that already exist. You can't make up your own top-level domain.
(2) Second-level domains
The second-level domain comes between "www." and ".com" so this is where you get your real customization. Many of these names are already taken, particularly with the ".com" top-level domain, so you may need to get creative to find a good domain name that is available.
(1) Sub-domains
The sub-domain comes to the left of the second-level domain. For example, most websites use "www" as the sub-domain. You don't actually need to pick a sub-domain when you buy a website, because if you buy "example.com", you automatically own all sub-domains of that (www.example.com, blog.example.com, etc.).
Finally, there are some odds and ends you should know before making the purchase. Domain names aren't case-sensitive which means that it doesn't matter how you capitalize it (example.com is the same as ExaMPle.com). Also, they're so cheap that you shouldn't wait to buy one just because you can't decide on a name. Buy one now to get started, and then if you think up something better, buy that too.
Now you know way more than you ever wanted to know about domains. If you don't already have a domain name, it's time to buy one. There are all kinds of domain registrars out there and they all do pretty much the same thing. Godaddy.com is the most popular one, but I personally have been using Dreamhost lately. As I mentioned above, you can buy a domain name from anyone and host the site elsewhere so it really doesn't matter where you buy it.
Tags: Websites Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010
By Tyler King
New Design
We have a completely new design for our blog, website, and application. If you're reading this from an email or RSS reader, you should click through to see what the blog looks like now. We completely redesigned our logo, picked new colors, and updated the entire site. If you have a customer manager account, you might want to log in and check out the major improvements we made to the user interface.
New Features
You can skip this part if you don't use our customer manager software. We've added some pretty cool features to the site that you should check out.
So please, go play around and let us know what you think.
Major blog news
We started this blog before we really knew what Less Annoying Software would turn into, and the material lacked focus as a result. Now that we've finished building our brand and identity, it makes sense to reconsider how this blog should really be used. Bracken and I are huge tech nerds, so we've written about tech, but our topics haven't really matched what we're doing with the company.
As of right now, this blog is now going to focus on software for small businesses. We know a lot about technology, and our customers are small businesses, so it makes sense to combine the two. We'll post tips, news, and reviews about software that we think small business should know about. We'll also post about Less Annoying Software product updates so that our customers can stay on top of the improvements we make.
We still have tons of other random tech thoughts, so I'll be picking up my old blog on tylerking.net again. Bracken will start posting at brackenking.com eventually, but that site is still under construction. So to summarize, the Less Annoying Blog will start giving advice specifically for small businesses (and independent business people) and Bracken and I will both post on our personal blogs with all the content that doesn't fit with this site.
I hope you like all the changes. I'd love to hear what you think! Monday, February 22nd, 2010
By Tyler King
In the software world, there are two primary systems for organizing information: folders and tags (also called labels). The difference is most noticeable as people transition from Outlook to Gmail, but I want to talk about the more general uses of tags and folders. Specifically, I’m going to go over when tags aren’t the right way to organize things.
First, let’s make sure everyone understands the difference between the two. While there are a lot of superficial differences, the thing that really separates the two is that a file can only exist in one folder, but a file can be associated with multiple tags. For example, let’s say you just bought an airplane ticket for your mom and you want to file away your confirmation email. You often classify your emails as “family” or “travel”. In this case, the email applies to both categories, but with folders you have to pick one. With tags, you can assign the email to both categories.
People often think there are other differences, such as a hierarchical structure (i.e. subfolders), but both folders and tags can support that (it’s just less common with tags).
In the example I gave above (organizing emails) the tag system is obviously much better than the folder system because it doesn’t make you choose between the two different categories. The problem is that people seem to think that tags are always better, but that’s just not the case. They are generally better, but sometimes organization requires mutual exclusivity between different categories.
I’ll use the Less Annoying Software CRM as an example of when tags just aren’t as useful. When you’re dealing with sales leads, you generally want each lead to belong to exactly one status. If someone fills out a contact form on your website, you would categorize them as a “lead”. If you call them up and decide that they aren’t ready to buy, you would categorize them as “inactive”. “Inactive” and “Lead” are mutually exclusive. It’s one or the other, never both. For this reason, we use a folder system (we call them “statuses”, but they’re basically the same thing as folders).
If you’re a hardcore tag supporter, you might wonder why it matters that the two statuses can’t both exist at the same time. The best reason I can come up with is because it messes up reporting. If I want to see a report of the current status (or folder) of all my leads, I can’t have overlap between inactive and active leads.
This is obviously a somewhat obscure example, but there are all kinds of different scenarios where folders actually do make sense. When I finish writing this blog post in Google Docs, I’m going to want to move it from the “draft” folder to the “published” folder. This means adding it to one and then removing it from the other, because Google uses tags for just about everything (they call them folders in Google Docs, but they’re really tags).
So enough rambling. What’s the point? The point is that in many cases folders are outdated and ineffective, but don’t disregard them entirely. They still serve a purpose, and if you find yourself designing software, I suggest you put some thought in before going with tags just because that’s what’s cool right now. Thursday, February 18th, 2010
By Tyler King
One thing that I'd like to point out is that logos only have the meaning you give them. No matter what kind of logo you design, it's going to look kind of silly by itself, but no matter how good or bad it is, people who visit your site and see the logo will generally just accept it as a part of your brand. It can be serif, sans-serif, green, blue or yellow. Whatever you make will seem natural to the user.
There will be four steps:
Disclaimer: Similar to my post about using gradients, I'm just highlighting some tricks you can use. I'm not suggesting you follow these directions exactly.
Ok, let's get started...
Step 1: Pick your font
Your logo needs a font that is distinctive, but very readable. Try to pick something that looks fairly standard but has a few unique characteristics that make it stand out a little. Two sites that I use to find free fonts (because they're the first two Google results) are http://www.1001freefonts.com/ and http://www.urbanfonts.com/.
For this example, I'll pick the first font that's currently featured on urbanfonts.com which is called "Mank Sans". To use a font, you'll need to install it on your computer (in windows, download the file, drag it from the zip file to your desktop, and then drag it into the C:\WINDOWS\Fonts folder). After installing it, the font should show up with all your other fonts in programs like Word and Fireworks (after restarting the program).
Ok, so here's what the font looks like plain:
Notice that it's very simple and plain, but it's clearly not one of the fonts you see every day (Arial, Times New Roman, etc).
Step 2: Pick your color
I'm a big fan of blueish green, so I'll go with that. You can pick whatever color you want. I'm also going to have the text fade from light green to dark green like I discussed in my post about gradients.
So here's what I have now:
Step 3: Draw a random shape
If you are an experienced designer, there are a lot of cool things you can do with your logo. If you're new to this, you can draw just about any random shape you want and put it next to the text. Like I said, people accept whatever you show them, so just because you know it's bs, that doesn't mean anyone else will.
I decided to draw a random shape with two different sections and I used the same gradient that I used with the text. Here's what it looks like:
See? That shape is meaningless. It's stupid. But if someone that didn't know any better went to my website, they wouldn't think about it like that. They aren't trying to challenge the site's design, so they don't think about the fact that I used a stupid meaningless shape.
Step 4: Add a reflection
This is a completely overused trick, but it's an effective way to make something look a little bit more flashy. So how do you add a reflection to the logo? It's simple. First, copy the entire image, paste it right below the current one, and flip the lower one upside down.
As you can see, I removed the "y" and the "g" from the lower half because those letters mess things up by going lower than the rest of the letters. There's not a great way to deal with this, so I just skip those letters entirely.
Now you just need to make the lower half of the text look like it's fading out. Put a gradient over the flipped version of the logo. Both sides of the gradient should be white, but you can change the transparency so that the top of the gradient is lighter than the bottom. Also, make sure the top part of the logo is on a layer above the lower one so that it isn't covered by this gradient. Here's what it looks like:
Now I'm just going to add some flair to bring things together. I'll scale the reflection vertically so it's not quite as tall as the main text, and I'll add a subtle grey fade (made with an elliptical gradient) behind the main text. This highlights the reflecting line making it look more believable.
That's all there is to it. It isn't the greatest logo ever, but it gets the job done and it only took me about 10 minutes to make. If you're designing a site, give these tricks a try, and let me know how it turns out.
Special Bonus Section
We're in the process of redesigning LessAnnoyingSoftware.com (and this blog). We haven't settled on anything final, but here's the logo we're thinking about using. I'd love to hear what you think.
Tags: Design
|
New posts will be emailed to you each night
About this blog
This is a blog for small businesses interested in how they can better use technology. Most tech
is targetted at either individual consumers or huge corporations. We'll help you find the tools
that are powerful enough to help run your business, but simple enough that you won't need an I.T.
team to use them.
There are two main writers on the Less Annoying Blog: Tyler has worked on the tech side of several small businesses and knows first hand what the little guys need, and don't need. Bracken is finishing up a PhD at MIT and he's always experimenting with any new software he can get his hands on. We also run an online customer manager tool called Less Annoying Software which was created specifically for small businesses to track all their customer activity.
Search the blog
Tips and Feedback
We obviously want to write about things that you want to read, so help us out! If you are
interested in reading about a particular topic, let us know. We're also always on the lookout for
new software and tools to try out (and review), so feel free to forward information on any new
tech you'd like us to write about.
You can reach us at blog@LessAnnoyingSoftware.com
Archives
|


